benboy hiking pants

at one point during my pants quest, i happened upon hiking pants. designed for active women, durable enough to conquer rocks and sticks and nature, fleece lined, water repellent. $40 on amazon prime? ok sure. ill bite. enter the benboy women's outdoor waterproof windproof fleece slim cargo snow hiking pants. all of the buzzwords. 7/10. product description from amazon:

based on reviews, i originally purchased a large, waited the requisite 2 days [pre-covid], and they arrived as a friend and i were standing in my kitchen having beers. naturally, i ripped off my pants and poured my body into them. "oh dear. err.. ummm can you breathe?" she asked. no. couldn't breathe, couldn't easily bend, but apparently they looked stellar. after gingerly extricating myself, i returned them for the extra large. unfortunately, i'm a large and a half. i kept the moderately too big size, and have worn them onsite more than a handful of times.

the fleece is directly bonded to the polyester exterior, so there isn't a second interior layer like some workpants. the surprisingly deep pockets hold keys and a phone, but due to the zip, aren't really compatible with my knife. obviously there aren't any side pockets for tools, nor a hammer loop; but if i put anything in the pockets, i very shortly would not be wearing pants. they do come with some attempt at a tactical belt to help counter the extra stretchy sides, but one afternoon i had several moments of panic in the portapotty [my ultimate nemesis] when i couldn't remember how to unclip it.

the inseam would be ideal for someone about 3" taller than i, but cuffed pants are the least of my worries these days. worn on a couple warm maine winter days, 30 degrees, give or take, these are pretty perfect. reviews on amazon recommend wearing a base layer under, but in my opinion, that defeats the purpose of lined pants. the pants are sturdy thus far, repel mud and water as well as can be expected, and are definitely a good mild weather alternative to many many layers. now if only they didn't fall down all the time..

Comments

carhartt slim-fit crawford

oh carhartts. when i first moved to maine, i had only ever seen carhartts as farm outerwear. on old men. welp, stick with what you know, or actually listen to your customers. i digress. of course i bought these full price, $50, and a size larger than usual. 6/10 website description : where do i even begin? generally i wear a size 12, across the board. fortunately i went into an actual carhartt store to try on pants, and out of vanity, only sized up to a 14. turns out, this style/cut runs the gamut of inconsistencies. i vaguely remember checking the website post-purchase, and seeing most recommendations for sizing at least 2 sizes larger than your norm; now half the reviews say everything is too large. back to sizing.. the "contoured waistband" somehow allows for gapping at the small of my back, while the front and sides are cutting into my internal organs. regular inseam is a joke, and the 32" is b...

dickies double-front carpenter

the dickies double-front duck carpenter pants. the poor working woman's alternative to carhartts, with much the same failings, but at half the price! $35 for your choice of 3 colors, and no inseam options. 6/10 the deets: ok. so they're pants. ostensibly, they're not hateful; they have functional pockets, a real hammer loop, a tool loop, multiple side pockets, and doublefront knees for when you have 45 minutes to try and cram a kneepad in there. and they make my ass look pretty ok. but those are the extent of the plusses. upon initial donning of the pants, one leg at a time mind you, the front is somehow too tight while the back gaps out away from the body. throughout the day, the crotch sags and bags in only the way duck pants can, but ... they function as pants. my standards get lower day by day.

dickies heritage stonewashed duck carpenter

where to begin with these pants. the website shows a model donning the pants with some rather hideous open-toed stack heeled boots cos you know, women amirite? thats all we care about. but sexist pandering aside, these pants are pretty alright, especially given the cost - originally $45, now on clearance. 7/10 the stretch canvas isn't overly-immediately-fall-off stretchy, but it is a bit thin. i don't know that they'll last very long, but they do allow for full range of movement, with actual functional back and front pockets and a hammer loop. no pencil/tool pocket on the side though, which is a downfall. as i continuously bake and eat during quarantine, i predict the visible bulges in the front waist of these pants will be more and more apparent, but through no fault of the manufacturer's. the legs aren't awkwardly tight or twisty, and the inseam is accurate. as these are more fashion than function pants, they aren't re...

Search This Blog