Skip to main content

BAD 925


BAD australia recently opened their north american webstore and for $50, obviously i had to try a pair.  well, they're not bad, but not great.  solid 8/10  their item description is as below:

someone clearly did put some thought into the fit, rather than just the ole "pink and shrink" the men's pants.  the elastic waist is very comfortable, allowing for all movement, hidden so to not look like sweatpants, and isn't so stretchy as to fall down constantly.  front pockets are deep, and lined in magenta, cos you know, girls, [i digress], and the back pockets have a reinforced nylon hem so you don't immediately rip them apart.  i'm not really sure what the aussie tradie infatuation with cargo pockets is, but they are functional for pens, a tape, handful of screws, whatever.


sizing is accurate and somewhat flexible, due to the elastic waist, however, i measure up at a full 5'5" [165cm] and these pants are short.  they offer a 29" inseam, 28" if you need a super small size, and their size chart recommends you try their men's pants if you need a longer inseam.  further, there is an awkward crotch bulge/seam action happening, that isn't really visible in the terrible lighting of my closet.  also, it is incredibly difficult to get a good picture of your own ass.

the pre-shrunk cotton blend fabric washes well and doesn't wrinkle substantially when left in the dryer for a week[s] or so.  they remind me a bit of hospital scrubs, from the material to the strange fit, but again, for the price, definitely worth a shot, and i'll keep rockin the aussie pants
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

carhartt slim-fit crawford

oh carhartts.  when i first moved to maine, i had only ever seen carhartts as farm outerwear.  on old men.  welp, stick with what you know, or actually listen to your customers.  i digress.  of course i bought these full price, $50, and a size larger than usual.  6/10   website description : where do i even begin?  generally i wear a size 12, across the board.  fortunately i went into an actual carhartt store to try on pants, and out of vanity, only sized up to a 14.  turns out, this style/cut runs the gamut of inconsistencies.  i vaguely remember checking the website post-purchase, and seeing most recommendations for sizing at least 2 sizes larger than your norm; now half the reviews say everything is too large.  back to sizing.. the "contoured waistband" somehow allows for gapping at the small of my back, while the front and sides are cutting into my internal organs.  regular inseam is a joke, and the 32" is b...
Post a Comment
Read more

dickies heritage stonewashed duck carpenter

where to begin with these pants.  the website  shows a model donning the pants with some rather hideous open-toed stack heeled boots cos you know, women amirite?  thats all we care about.  but sexist pandering aside, these pants are pretty alright, especially given the cost - originally $45, now on clearance.  7/10 the stretch canvas isn't overly-immediately-fall-off stretchy, but it is a bit thin.  i don't know that they'll last very long, but they do allow for full range of movement, with actual functional back and front pockets and a hammer loop.  no pencil/tool pocket on the side though, which is a downfall.  as i continuously bake and eat during quarantine, i predict the visible bulges in the front waist of these pants will be more and more apparent, but through no fault of the manufacturer's.  the legs aren't awkwardly tight or twisty, and the inseam is accurate. as these are more fashion than function pants, they aren't re...
Post a Comment
Read more

dickies double-front carpenter

the dickies double-front duck carpenter pants.  the poor working woman's alternative to carhartts, with much the same failings, but at half the price!  $35 for your choice of 3 colors, and no inseam options.  6/10  the deets: ok.  so they're pants.  ostensibly, they're not hateful; they have functional pockets, a real hammer loop, a tool loop, multiple side pockets, and doublefront knees for when you have 45 minutes to try and cram a kneepad in there.  and they make my ass look pretty ok.  but those are the extent of the plusses.   upon initial donning of the pants, one leg at a time mind you, the front is somehow too tight while the back gaps out away from the body.  throughout the day, the crotch sags and bags in only the way duck pants can, but ... they function as pants.  my standards get lower day by day.
Post a Comment
Read more